 |
Roy Pollock
Chief Learning Officer
Fort Hill Company
I am keenly interested in the best practices that
allow companies to maximize the return on their educational investments
- especially in the areas of management and leadership.
I have seen first-hand how enlightened leadership
can positively transform whole organizations and how well-designed
and -executed development programs can help fill the leadership
pipeline.
As a manager, however, I am also sensitive to the
need for learning and development programs to also demonstrate practical
business impact.
I am gratified that my work with Fort Hill allows
me to help companies achieve both these ends.
Roy Pollock
is the Chief Learning Officer of the Fort Hill Company, Wilmington,
Delaware,
Before joining
Fort Hill, Dr. Pollock held a number of senior leadership positions
including Assistant Dean for Curriculum Development, College of
Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; Vice President, Companion
Animal Division, Pfizer Animal Health; and President, IDEXX Informatics.
Dr. Pollock
earned his Doctor of Veterinary Medicine and PhD degrees and Cornell
University and studied medical education at the University of Illinois
in Chicago.
He is the author
of more than 50 scientific papers and book chapters, a Kellogg National
Leadership Fellow and the recipient of numerous awards.
He can be reached
at: pollock@forthillcompany.com
The purpose
of the Learning Alert is to share best practices that help
learners follow-through and improve their personal and business
results.
Please feel
free to forward this issue to your colleagues.
Email to a colleague.
If you are not
already receiving Learning Alert and would like to subscribe,
send your name, title and company to: subscribe@LearningAlert.com
If you no longer
wish to receive Learning Alert, please send your email
address to: unsubscribe@LearningAlert.com
and we will remove you from the recipient list.
To send feedback
on this issue or ideas for future Learning Alerts, please
email us at: ideas@LearningAlert.com.
Recent
Learning Alerts
|  |
 |
A
New Beginning
Roy
V. H. Pollock, DVM, PhD
As we begin
a new year, it is appropriate to “begin at the beginning”
and challenge ourselves to rethink the way we define objectives
for learning and development programs.
All well-designed
programs have clearly defined objectives. For example, “At
the completion of the program, participants will be able to describe
the four developmental levels for each of the key tasks,”
or “participants will enhance their ability to give and receive
constructive feedback.”
But in the
course of researching our book, The Six Disciplines of Breakthrough
Learning (Pfeiffer, April 2006), we began to suspect that the
way in which objectives are usually written is suboptimal. Why?
Because they tend to focus on learning as opposed to doing,
on creating capability as opposed to putting
capabilities to work.
Because of
my experience as a line manager (Vice President at Pfizer), my approach
is very pragmatic; my interest is enhanced performance.
I know that
training and development create critical new capabilities by providing
knowledge, skills, insights, approaches, and so forth. But unless
those new capabilities are put to work in a way that improves personal
and organizational performance, they are of no value to the business
for which I am responsible.
“The
impact that results from training is realized only after training-acquired
skills are used by trainees in on-the-job behaviors.”
– Brinkerhoff and Apking |
Thus, achieving
typical program objectives, such as being able to “describe
developmental levels” or “give constructive feedback”
are important prerequisites to enhanced performance. They are necessary,
but not sufficient. Unless steps are taken to ensure that the new
capabilities are transferred and applied to the participant’s
work, then the program may achieve its stated objectives, but fail
to fulfill its organizational purpose of improving performance.
We encourage
our clients to “raise the bar” for learning and development
by redefining program objectives from what participants will learn,
to what they will actually do better and differently as
a result and how that will benefit the business.
So, the objective
becomes not only to “enhance the ability to provide constructive
feedback,” but that "following the program, participants
will use their enhanced feedback skills to provide more frequent
and more valuable feedback to their employees, thereby enhancing
performance and retention.”
Expanding program
objectives belying"learning" to “doing” has
several important benefits:
- It makes
the business relevance and value of training and development much
clearer to the line managers who fund the program and the employees
who attend.
- It redefines
the finish line of the program from the last day of class to successful
transfer and application on the job (see Learning
Alert #11).
- It facilitates
measurement by setting out, in advance, the definition of success.
- It underscores
the interdependency between training and management. Learning
and development programs cannot achieve “doing” objectives
without reinforcement and support from participants’ managers.
Redefining objectives in terms of workplace behaviors and results
challenges us to think creatively about the need for continuing
learning and support outside the classroom box.
Pressure to
demonstrate business impact and return from development investments
continues to build. Redefining program objectives in business terms
is an important place to start a new year and key to delivering
on training’s promise of improved workplace results.
Ideas
Into Action
- Review the
objectives of your most important program as currently stated.
Is the business relevance obvious? Is it clear how participants
are expected to use what they have learned and what is the intended
benefit? Check your answers with key business stakeholders.
- Use Brinkerhoff’s
Impact Mapping Process to ensure firm linkage between business
needs and learning programs.
- Redefine
the finish line by stating the program objectives in terms of
what participants will be doing better and differently in their
jobs as a result of attending. Evaluate the impact this has on
how the program is conducted and, in particular, what is needed
to assure accountability and support after the formal instruction
ends.
References:
Wick, Pollock,
Jefferson and Flanagan. The Six Disciplines of Breakthrough
Learning: How to Turn Training and Development into Business Results.
San Francisco: Pfeiffer, in press, available April 2006.
Brinkerhoff and Apking, High Impact Learning: Strategies for
Leveraging Business Results from Training. New York: Basic
Books, 2001
Learning
Alert is sponsored by:

Copyright
2006, Fort Hill Company, All rights reserved
|
 |